CMW: The Corporate & Risk Operations Brief delivers weekly insight on how market shifts, operational decisions, and policy signals translate into real-world risk and execution pressure for corporate leaders.

CMW: The Corporate & Risk Operations Brief  is built for leaders navigating risk in real time.

Behind the Numbers: Tariff Refunds After the Supreme Court Ruling

by CMW: The Corporate & Risk Operations Brief Contributor

What’s happening

The U.S. Supreme Court recently invalidated a broad set of tariffs imposed under emergency authority, putting at least $130 billion in collected duties into question. In response, roughly 1,800 companies—among them FedEx, Costco Wholesale, and Goodyear Tire & Rubber—have filed refund claims in the U.S. Court of International Trade. However, there is no automatic refund mechanism in place. The administration has indicated that future tariff strategies may rely on alternative statutory authorities, signaling that trade-related litigation and policy uncertainty are far from over.

Why it matters

For businesses—particularly smaller importers—the stakes are significant. More than 300,000 importers were subject to the struck-down tariffs. Recovering funds could materially affect balance sheets, working capital, and pricing strategies. Yet legal costs, procedural complexity, and unclear timelines make recovery uncertain. Larger firms can absorb litigation expenses; smaller companies may not. The broader concern is policy volatility: even as one tariff regime is overturned, new sector-specific or temporary tariffs could emerge, complicating supply chains and capital allocation decisions.

What’s the risk exposure

Risk exposure is both financial and operational. Companies that paid tariffs may face years of litigation with no guarantee of reimbursement, tying up cash and management focus. Refund eligibility may depend on whether a firm files suit, creating uneven outcomes across industries. There is also forward-looking risk: alternative trade authorities could be used to reimpose targeted or temporary tariffs, potentially overlapping with prior measures. This creates planning challenges for procurement, pricing, and inventory management. Smaller firms without in-house trade counsel are particularly exposed to compliance missteps and missed filing windows.

What to watch next

Key developments will unfold in the trade court, where judges may determine whether to establish a structured, court-supervised refund process. The administration’s formal response to refund motions will set the tone for settlement versus prolonged appeals. Congressional action remains possible but uncertain in a divided political environment. Watch also for new tariff actions under different statutory provisions, which could shift exposure from broad-based duties to sector-specific measures. Finally, monitor whether class-action litigation gains traction, potentially widening access to relief for smaller importers.

Key Risks & Considerations

Sources

• Waiting on a tariff refund after Trump’s duties were struck down? Don’t bother | Gene Marks | The Guardian

• The $130 Billion Race for Companies to Get Their Tariff Money Back - WSJ

What HALO Means for Risk and Operations Leaders

by CMW: The Corporate & Risk Operations Brief Contributor

HALO—short for heavy assets, low obsolescence—describes companies viewed as less exposed to disruption from artificial intelligence. These are firms with physical infrastructure, supply chains, or essential services that software alone cannot easily replace. Recent market rotations show capital moving from high-growth tech names toward industrials, energy, utilities, and consumer staples.

For risk and operations leaders, HALO signals a repricing of disruption risk. Investors are scrutinizing which business models can withstand automation shocks. The implication: stress-test digital exposure, evaluate asset resilience, and assess where AI enhances efficiency versus threatens core revenue streams.

Sources

• Wall Street’s Latest Bet Is on ‘HALO’ Companies With AI Immunity - WSJ

• What are HALO Stocks and Should You Invest in Them This Year? | Nasdaq

Energy Shock Tests Markets and Operational Resilience

Global markets opened the week volatile following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, with investors assessing potential disruptions to energy supply and logistics. The S&P 500 finished flat after early losses, while the Nasdaq Composite edged higher. European and Asian equities declined, oil prices settled near $78 per barrel, and gold and the U.S. dollar strengthened as capital moved toward traditional safe havens.

For risk and operations leaders, the focal point is energy and shipping exposure. Reduced traffic through the Strait of Hormuz and halted LNG production in Qatar underscore supply chain fragility. Sustained oil and gas price increases could pressure transportation, manufacturing, and travel margins, while higher yields and inflation expectations may tighten financing conditions.

Sources

• Global Markets Whipsaw After U.S.-Israel Attack on Iran - The New York Times

Executive Quote

Jamie Dimon Says Iran Conflict Won’t Be Major Inflationary Hit

Thanks for joining us this week. Please send questions, feedback, and pitches by hitting reply to this email.